• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

  • ABOUT
    • ATTORNEYS
      • MARK H. WAGNER
      • OUTSIDE CO-COUNSEL
    • AREAS WE SERVE
    • ARTICLES
    • RESOURCES
    • RESULTS
    • CLIENT REVIEWS
    • VIDEOS
  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • GENDER/SEX DISCRIMINATION
      • PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
      • RACE/NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
      • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/
      WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Employment

August 28, 2013

California Severely Limits Potential Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees to Prevailing Employers

State Bill 462, enacted in August 2013, amended Labor Code section 218.5. The statute previously provided that attorneys’ fees are recoverable by the prevailing party in lawsuits to recover unpaid wages, to either the employer or employee, whoever wins. Now, it provides that a prevailing employer

Employment,  Litigation

February 25, 2013

Employees Are Protected Under the FEHA Even After Exhausting Leave Under the Pregnancy Disability Leave Law

In Sanchez v. Swissport, Inc., the Appellate Court held that even if an employee exhausts all of the permissible leave under the Pregnancy Disability Leave Law (“PDLL”), they can still file a claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). The plaintiff sued her employer alleging that she

Employment,  Litigation

February 10, 2013

California Supreme Court Rules On The Mixed Motive Defense

In Harris v. City of Santa Monica, the California Supreme Court ruled that under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), when a jury finds that unlawful discrimination was a substantial factor motivating a termination of employment, and when the employer proves it would have made the same

Employment,  Litigation

December 20, 2012

Arbitration Award Vacated: CFRA Entitles Employee To Reinstatement

In Richey v. AutoNation, Inc., the Court held that an employer’s good-faith belief that employee was misusing medical leave did not justify terminating his employment.  The plaintiff, a sales manager at the car dealership, was on medical leave protected by the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”). 

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

December 20, 2012

Federal Arbitration Act Controls Dispute Over Oklahoma Non-Competition Agreement

In Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Howard, the United States Supreme Court reversed a decision by the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act has supremacy over a state law that limits the enforceability of non-competition agreements.  By declaring the

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

November 20, 2012

Plaintiff Who Did Not Sign Arbitration Agreement Was Not Required To Arbitrate

In Gorlach v. The Sports Club Company, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination, retaliation, sexual harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, breach of contract, and negligence. The employer attempted to enforce an arbitration agreement. The parties agreed

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

August 3, 2012

Appellate Court Upholds Denial Of Arbitration In Wrongful Termination Case

In Sparks v. Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services, the Court of Appeals upheld a trial court’s decision denying defendant’s petition to compel arbitration of the wrongful termination claims of its former employee. There, Plaintiff filed a wrongful termination complaint against his former

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

July 5, 2012

A Partnership Is Liable For Retaliation Against A Partner For Reporting Harassment

In Fitzsimons v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group, the Court of Appeals held that the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) supports a claim for retaliation by a partner against her partnership for opposing sexual harassment of an employee.  The defendant was a large California general

Employment,  Litigation

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

(310) 857-5293

Free Consultation

SCHEDULE

Practice Areas

  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • Gender/Sex Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race/National Origin Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY

ARRANGE A FREE CONSULTATION

consult

Footer

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
(310) 857-5293

2601 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90405

Wagner Legal Group P.C.

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

© 2023 WAGNER LEGAL GROUP, P.C. | Legal Disclaimer ● Privacy Policy ● Sitemap