• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

  • ABOUT
    • ATTORNEYS
      • MARK H. WAGNER
      • OUTSIDE CO-COUNSEL
    • AREAS WE SERVE
    • ARTICLES
    • RESOURCES
    • RESULTS
    • CLIENT REVIEWS
    • VIDEOS
  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • GENDER/SEX DISCRIMINATION
      • PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
      • RACE/NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
      • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/
      WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Blog

PAGA Claims May Not Be Waived By Pre-Dispute Agreements

PAGA Claims May Not Be Waived By Pre-Dispute Agreements

November 22, 2016 by Mark H. Wagner

In Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale’s, the Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s denial of Bloomingdale’s motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiff’s claims brought on behalf of herself and her fellow employees pursuant to the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Here, Plaintiff signed an arbitration agreement as a condition of her employment in which the relevant language required that Plaintiff submit all employment-related legal disputes to arbitration and that Plaintiff refrain from bringing any class suits. The Court held that representative action waivers – in other words, employees contractually agreeing to give up their right bring a PAGA claim via a pre-dispute waiver – are unenforceable and not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), thus affirming the holding of Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles. Furthermore, the Court added that a PAGA claim brought in an individual capacity cannot be arbitrated pursuant to a pre-dispute agreement without the consent of the state. The Court reasoned that the FAA ensures an efficient forum for the resolution of private disputes while PAGA claims, even those brought in an individual capacity, are essentially brought on behalf of the government as a way to enforce state law. However, it is important to note that the Court declined to answer whether individual PAGA claims should be recognized as valid causes of action.

For more information, or if you need legal assistance, please contact the Wagner Legal Group, P.C. at (310) 857-5293 or fill out our contact form on the website.

Employment,  Litigation

Primary Sidebar

(310) 857-5293

Free Consultation

SCHEDULE

Practice Areas

  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • Gender/Sex Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race/National Origin Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY

ARRANGE A FREE CONSULTATION

consult

Footer

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
(310) 857-5293

2601 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90405

Wagner Legal Group P.C.

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

© 2023 WAGNER LEGAL GROUP, P.C. | Legal Disclaimer ● Privacy Policy ● Sitemap