• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

  • ABOUT
    • ATTORNEYS
      • MARK H. WAGNER
      • OUTSIDE CO-COUNSEL
    • AREAS WE SERVE
    • ARTICLES
    • RESOURCES
    • RESULTS
    • CLIENT REVIEWS
    • VIDEOS
  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • GENDER/SEX DISCRIMINATION
      • PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
      • RACE/NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
      • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/
      WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Litigation

February 19, 2012

Appellate Court Upholds Trial Court’s Ruling Holding That An Arbitration Provision Is Unconscionable

In Ajamian v. CantorCO2e, the Court of Appeal held that an arbitration provision in an employment contract was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding it unconscionable.  It also held the trial court properly found that the

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

February 10, 2012

Court Reverses Class Action Judgment After Trial And Orders The Class Be Decertified

This was a class action alleging claims of misclassification brought under various provisions of the California Labor Code, as well as conversion and unfair competition, claiming that certain business bankers were misclassified.  Defendant U.S. Bank claimed that the employees were properly

Employment,  Litigation

February 6, 2012

Appellate Court Upholds Trial Court’s Ruling That Arbitration Provision Is Unconscionable

In Mayers v. Volt Management Corp, the Court of Appeals ruled that an arbitration agreement was unconscionable.  There, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against his former employer alleging several claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). The Defendant filed a motion to compel

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

January 13, 2012

U.S. Supreme Court Protects Religious Organization From Suit By Former Teacher

In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 132 S. Ct. 694 (2012), the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor a religious organization being sued by a former teacher.  There, a former employee filed a charge with the E.E.O.C. claiming that

Employment,  Litigation

January 7, 2012

Court Upholds Invalidation of Pre-Employment Arbitration Clause

In Wisdom v. AccentCare, Inc. 202 Cal.App.4th 591, (2012), the Court held that an arbitration agreement found in a pre-employment application was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.  The Court held that the arbitration provision was procedurally unconscionable “because its language

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

September 5, 2011

Court Holds That $250,000 Statutory Cap On Non-Economic Damages Is Constitutional

In Stinnett v. Tam, the California Court of Appeals held that that Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act’s $250,000 cap on non-economic damages was constitutional. Holly Stinnett sued, among others, Tony Tam, M.D. and Modesto Surgical Associates, for the wrongful death of her husband due to

Litigation,  Personal Injury

September 1, 2011

Arbitrator Can Rule On A Contract Dispute Involving A Non-Licensed Contractor

In Templo Calvario Spanish Assembly of God v. Gardner Construction Corporation, the Court of Appeals held thatthe Contractors’ State License Law does not automatically void all contracts entered by unlicensed contractors, and thus an arbitrator’s ruling involving a contract dispute with a

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Business Litigation,  Litigation,  Real Estate

August 28, 2011

Employee Of Independent Contractor Cannot Sue The Company That Hired The Independent Contractor

In SeaBright Insurance Co. v. US Airways, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that an employee of an independent contractor who was injured in the workplace could not sue the party that hired the contractor company to do the work, even when this party failed to comply with workplace safety

Employment,  Litigation

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

(310) 857-5293

Free Consultation

SCHEDULE

Practice Areas

  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • Gender/Sex Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race/National Origin Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY

ARRANGE A FREE CONSULTATION

consult

Footer

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
(310) 857-5293

2601 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90405

Wagner Legal Group P.C.

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

© 2023 WAGNER LEGAL GROUP, P.C. | Legal Disclaimer ● Privacy Policy ● Sitemap