• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

  • ABOUT
    • ATTORNEYS
      • MARK H. WAGNER
      • OUTSIDE CO-COUNSEL
    • AREAS WE SERVE
    • ARTICLES
    • RESOURCES
    • RESULTS
    • CLIENT REVIEWS
    • VIDEOS
  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • GENDER/SEX DISCRIMINATION
      • PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
      • RACE/NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
      • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/
      WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Litigation

August 3, 2012

Appellate Court Upholds Denial Of Arbitration In Wrongful Termination Case

In Sparks v. Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services, the Court of Appeals upheld a trial court’s decision denying defendant’s petition to compel arbitration of the wrongful termination claims of its former employee. There, Plaintiff filed a wrongful termination complaint against his former

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

July 5, 2012

A Partnership Is Liable For Retaliation Against A Partner For Reporting Harassment

In Fitzsimons v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group, the Court of Appeals held that the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) supports a claim for retaliation by a partner against her partnership for opposing sexual harassment of an employee.  The defendant was a large California general

Employment,  Litigation

July 5, 2012

Corporate Franchisor Can Be Liable To Employee Of Local Franchisee

In Patterson v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC, the Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s granting of summary judgment for Domino’s corporate in a lawsuit by an employee of a franchisee.  Patterson was an employee of Sui Juris, a Domino’s pizza franchisee.  Patterson claimed her manager, Renee Miranda,

Employment,  Litigation

June 28, 2012

Coito: Supreme Court Clarifies Rule On Attorney Work Product Privileges

In Coito v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court resolved a long-standing dispute on the protections under the Attorney Work Product doctrine.  The Court addressed what work product protection, if any, should be accorded to 1) recordings of witness interviews conducted by investigators

Business Litigation,  Employment,  Litigation

June 21, 2012

A DFEH Complaint Filed Online By The Lawyer Is Valid

In Rickards v. United Parcel Service, Inc., the Court of Appeal held that the administrative complaint filed through Department of Fair Employment and Housing’s (“DFEH”) automated online system was properly verified where plaintiff’s attorney filed the complaint on plaintiff’s behalf and received an

Employment,  Litigation

June 19, 2012

Failure To Pay Arbitration Fees Was A Waiver Of Right To Arbitrate

In Cinel v. Barna, the Court of Appeals ruled that the failure to pay the arbitrator’s fees constitutes a waiver of arbitration. There, numerous parties were ordered to arbitrate by the trial court.  The plaintiff paid his portion of the fees, as did two of six defendants.  At that point, the

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Business Litigation,  Employment,  Litigation

June 16, 2012

Defendant Waived Arbitration Rights By Litigating Case For Over A Year

In Hoover v. American Income Life Insurance Company, the Court of Appeals ruled that the defendant waived any right to arbitrate by actively litigating with the plaintiff for more than a year, which caused plaintiff prejudice.  The Court noted that defendant engaged in discovery, including

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

June 16, 2012

Failure To Sign Disciplinary Memo Resulting In Termination Leads To No Unemployment Benefits

In Paratransit, Inv. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, the Court of Appeals upheld a trial court’s ruling that the plaintiff was not entitled to unemployment benefits.  The employee was working for a company and was being disciplined for alleged wrongful conduct.  The employee refused to sign

Employment,  Litigation

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

(310) 857-5293

Free Consultation

SCHEDULE

Practice Areas

  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • Gender/Sex Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race/National Origin Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY

ARRANGE A FREE CONSULTATION

consult

Footer

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
(310) 857-5293

2601 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90405

Wagner Legal Group P.C.

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

© 2023 WAGNER LEGAL GROUP, P.C. | Legal Disclaimer ● Privacy Policy ● Sitemap