• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

  • ABOUT
    • ATTORNEYS
      • MARK H. WAGNER
      • OUTSIDE CO-COUNSEL
    • AREAS WE SERVE
    • ARTICLES
    • RESOURCES
    • RESULTS
    • CLIENT REVIEWS
    • VIDEOS
  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • GENDER/SEX DISCRIMINATION
      • PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
      • RACE/NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
      • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/
      WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Employment

June 6, 2012

Successor Car Wash Company Liable For Wage Violations By Predecessor

In People ex rel. Harris v. Sunset Car Wash, LLC, the Court held that that a successor company was liable for unpaid wages and penalties for violations by the predecessor car wash company.  Auto Spa operated a car wash on Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles.  Sunset Alvarado Investors, which held a note

Employment,  Litigation

June 6, 2012

Court Unanimously Holds Arbitration Agreement Unconscionable And That California Law On Arbitration Still Applies Despite The Supreme Court Ruling In Conception

Plaintiffs were two carpet installers that worked for defendant.  When they were initially hired, and again later during their employment, plaintiffs were given form contracts and told to sign them if they wanted to work for Empire. Both contracts were presented only in English, despite the fact

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

April 19, 2012

Court Holds That An Arbitration Agreement That Allows The Employer To Unilaterally Modify Or Revoke Arbitration Clauses Is Unenforceable

This week, in Peleg v. Niemen-Marcus Group, Inc., the California Court Of Appeals held that an arbitration agreement that allowed an employer to unilaterally modify or revoke the arbitration agreement with 30 days’ notice was unenforceable.  The Court held also held that it was proper for the trial

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

April 12, 2012

California Supreme Court Hands Down Key Decision On Class Actions and Meal And Rest Breaks

Earlier today, the California Supreme Court finally issued its long-awaited decision in the case of Brinker v. Superior Court, a case involving class action issues, as well as meal and rest break requirements and procedures.  While many have claimed this is a major victory for employers, that is not

Employment,  Litigation

April 5, 2012

Defendant In FEHA Case Cannot Recover Expert Costs Upon Prevailing Absent A Showing The Action Was Frivolous

In Baker v. Mulholland Security and Patrol, Inc., plaintiff sued his employer for retaliation, failure to pay overtime compensation, and failure to maintain records, claiming he was terminated after he complained about discriminatory remarks made on the job. The trial court disposed of his

Employment,  Litigation

April 2, 2012

Is Being Unemployed Going To Be A Protected Class Under California Law?

As this economy continues to flounder and unemployment rates remain high, states are trying to take proactive approaches to help unemployed workers find jobs.  AB 1450 is a California bill that was introduced in January 2012 to protect unemployed workers and prohibit an employer from discriminating

Employment

March 25, 2012

California Reacts To Privacy Concerns Over Social Media Usernames And Passwords

Recently, news spread that companies were asking job applicants and/or employees for their Facebook and other social media passwords.  Many raised the question whether this was legal.  Of course, there was also the debate about whether this was the right thing to do or simply bad business.  In

Employment

February 19, 2012

Appellate Court Upholds Trial Court’s Ruling Holding That An Arbitration Provision Is Unconscionable

In Ajamian v. CantorCO2e, the Court of Appeal held that an arbitration provision in an employment contract was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding it unconscionable.  It also held the trial court properly found that the

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

(310) 857-5293

Free Consultation

SCHEDULE

Practice Areas

  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • Gender/Sex Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race/National Origin Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY

ARRANGE A FREE CONSULTATION

consult

Footer

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
(310) 857-5293

2601 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90405

Wagner Legal Group P.C.

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

© 2023 WAGNER LEGAL GROUP, P.C. | Legal Disclaimer ● Privacy Policy ● Sitemap