• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

  • ABOUT
    • ATTORNEYS
      • MARK H. WAGNER
      • OUTSIDE CO-COUNSEL
    • AREAS WE SERVE
    • ARTICLES
    • RESOURCES
    • RESULTS
    • CLIENT REVIEWS
    • VIDEOS
  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • GENDER/SEX DISCRIMINATION
      • PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
      • RACE/NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
      • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/
      WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Employment

October 16, 2015

Plaintiff Without Standing Could Not Obtain Class Discovery

In CVS Pharmacy v. Super. Ct. (Deluca), the Court addressed under what circumstances can a plaintiff who seeks injunctive relief on behalf of a class of which the plaintiff is not a member obtain precertification discovery to seek out a legitimate plaintiff to support an action for injunctive relief

Business Litigation,  Employment,  Litigation

October 2, 2015

Labor Code Section 1102.5 Protects Whistleblower

In Cardenas v. M. Fanaian, D.D.S., Inc., the Court analyzed potential whistleblower retaliation claims. After Cardenas reported to the police that a coworker may have stolen her wedding ring at her workplace, she was terminated from her employment as a dental hygienist.  Cardenas filed a lawsuit

Employment,  Litigation

September 29, 2015

Sheriff Deputy Can Be Fired For Off-Duty Status Misconduct

In Negron v. Los Angeles County Civ. Serv. Comm, the Court addressed the question whether the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department can discharge a deputy sheriff for misconduct committed while the deputy was on unpaid, relieved-of-duty status.  The Court concluded that the Department had the

Employment,  Litigation

September 28, 2015

PAGA Is Not Preempted By Federal Arbitration Act

In Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., the Court reversed the district court’s order granting Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration of claims and dismissing plaintiff’s first amended complaint, in a putative class action raising class employment-related

Employment,  Litigation

August 20, 2015

Arbitrator To Decide Whether Class Action Relief Is Permitted Under Contract

In Universal Protection Service, LP v. Superior Court (Parnow), the Court of Appeals denied a mandamus petition seeking to set aside an order compelling the employer to submit to arbitration --based on employment agreements drafted by the employer-- including submitting to the arbitrator the issue

Employment,  Litigation

August 16, 2015

Federal Law Controls Issue of Arbitration Under the FAA

In Brennan v. Opus Bank, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that federal law controlled the issue whether an employment contract dispute was arbitrable where the agreement was covered by the Federal Arbitration Act, and the parties did not clearly and unmistakenly designate that nonfederal

Alternative Dispute Resolution,  Employment,  Litigation

June 30, 2015

“Death Knell” Doctrine Does Not Apply When PAGA Claim Remains In Trial Court

In Munoz v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Court held that the “death knell” doctrine did not apply and a claim was not appealable. Under California law, an order denying a motion to certify all class claims leaving only the named plaintiff’s individual claims in the trial court is an appealable

Employment,  Litigation

June 26, 2015

Employer Should Withhold Payroll Taxes When Paying Judgment After Lawsuit

In Cifuentes v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Cifuentes won a judgment for lost wages against his former employer, Costco. Costco withheld federal and state payroll taxes from the award when paying it. Cifuentes claimed the judgment was not satisfied, citing the decision in Lisec v. United Airlines,

Employment,  Litigation

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

(310) 857-5293

Free Consultation

SCHEDULE

Practice Areas

  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • Gender/Sex Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race/National Origin Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY

ARRANGE A FREE CONSULTATION

consult

Footer

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
(310) 857-5293

2601 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90405

Wagner Legal Group P.C.

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

© 2023 WAGNER LEGAL GROUP, P.C. | Legal Disclaimer ● Privacy Policy ● Sitemap