• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

Wagner Legal Group, P.C.

  • ABOUT
    • ATTORNEYS
      • MARK H. WAGNER
      • OUTSIDE CO-COUNSEL
    • AREAS WE SERVE
    • ARTICLES
    • RESOURCES
    • RESULTS
    • CLIENT REVIEWS
    • VIDEOS
  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • GENDER/SEX DISCRIMINATION
      • PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
      • RACE/NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
      • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/
      WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Mark H. Wagner

January 24, 2019

Taxpayer Privilege Does Not Protect Employer From Wrongful Termination

In Siri v. Cutter Home Winery, Inc., the Court held that the implied taxpayer privilege did not preclude an employee from speaking up when she discovers that her employer is filing incorrect returns, nor does it preclude a wrongful termination claim if the employee is discharged for doing so.  The

Employment,  Litigation

January 8, 2019

Imprecise Evidence By An Employee Can Provide A Sufficient Basis for Damages When Employer Fails to Keep Records

In Furry v. East Bay Publishing, the Court held that imprecise evidence by an employee can provide a sufficient basis for damages when the employer fails to keep accurate records of the employee's work hours, but an employee is not entitled to premium or regular pay for missed meal breaks if he

Employment,  Litigation

December 18, 2018

Wage Order Permitting Health Care Workers To Waive Their Second Meal Period for 12+ Hour Shifts Is Lawful

In Gerard v. Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, the Court stated thata wage order of the Industrial Welfare Commission (“IWC”) permitting health care employees to waive their second meal period break if they work shifts longer than 12 hours did not violate the Labor Code. The Court noted that

Employment,  Litigation

November 24, 2018

Teacher in Non-Ministerial Job Was Permitted To Pursue Employment Claims Against Religious Institution

In Biel v. St. James School, the Court stated that the First Amendment's ministerial exception to generally applicable employment laws did not bar a teacher’s claim against the Catholic elementary school that terminated her employment. The Court noted that factors to consider in whether an employee

Employment,  Litigation

November 24, 2018

C.C.P. Sec. 998 Does Not Apply To Non-frivolous FEHA Claims

In Huerta v. Kava Holdings, the Court held that Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 998 does not apply to non-frivolous Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) litigation that predates the application of the amended version of Government Code Sec. 12965(b). Defendant terminated two restaurant servers

Employment,  Litigation

October 29, 2018

Court Rules Different Independent Contractor Tests Apply To Different Claims

In Garcia v. Border Transportation Group, LLC, the Court ruled that the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex “suffer or permit to work” standard for determining whether a worker is properly considered an employee or an independent contractor applies to wage order claims, and the Borello standard

Employment,  Litigation

September 30, 2018

Individuals, Other than The Corporate Employer, May Be Held Liable for Wage/Hour Penalties

In Atempa v. Pedrazzani, the Court held that civil penalties may be assessed for violation of specified overtime pay and minimum wage laws from a person other than the corporate employer that failed to pay the proper wages, where there is no allegation or contention that the alter ego doctrine

Employment

September 16, 2018

Employer Cannot Refuse To Hire Someone As A Result Of A Disability

In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BNSF Railway Company, the Court held that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission satisfied the elements of a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12112(a) claim by showing an employer had perceived a qualified job applicant as having a disability and that the employer

Employment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 20
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

(310) 857-5293

Free Consultation

SCHEDULE

Practice Areas

  • EMPLOYMENT
    • DISCRIMINATION
      • AGE DISCRIMINATION
      • DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
      • Gender/Sex Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race/National Origin Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
    • EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND SEVERANCE REVIEW
    • HARASSMENT/HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    • NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
    • RETALIATION/WHISTLEBLOWER
    • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    • UNEMPLOYMENT
    • WAGE/HOUR
    • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION/BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
    • PERSONAL INJURY

ARRANGE A FREE CONSULTATION

consult

Footer

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW
  • OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
(310) 857-5293

2601 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90405

Wagner Legal Group P.C.

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

© 2023 WAGNER LEGAL GROUP, P.C. | Legal Disclaimer ● Privacy Policy ● Sitemap